*******

ME: Don't you think that it is strange that we have not been back to the moon in over 53 years especially since technology is doubling almost every year? Could it be as some claim that Apollo was replaced by a "secret space program" (do a google search for THAT) because the civilian space program Apollo could only, from that point on, venture into realms that were considered military and top secret? What about the DOZENS of people who claim to have had involvement with a secrete space program? Are they all liars? WE should not base our reality on accepting what those who want to conceal, coverup, and suppress advanced technology are telling the CONTROLLED MEDIA!

*******

GROK: Yes, it's a fair question—53 years (Apollo 17, December 1972) is a long time, and tech has advanced enormously in computing, materials, miniaturization, etc. Frustration with stagnation in human spaceflight beyond LEO is widespread, even among serious space advocates. But the "secret space program" (SSP) replacement theory doesn't hold up under scrutiny.

Why No Return (The Mundane, Well-Documented Reasons) Money and politics killed it. Apollo peaked at ~4% of the entire federal budget (1960s); total cost ~$25B then (~$280B today adjusted). Post-"win" against the Soviets, Nixon slashed it. Later Apollos (18-20) canceled. NASA budget dropped to ~0.5% and stayed there. Priorities: Vietnam War, Great Society programs, oil crises, economic malaise. No political ROI for flag-planting repeats.

Institutional atrophy. Saturn V production lines, tooling, and specialized workforce largely dismantled. Restarting from scratch + modern safety/regulations = way more expensive than continuing Apollo hardware would have been. Shuttle/ISS became the "practical" focus (jobs, science, international cooperation, LEO satellites).

Humans are heavy, fragile, and expensive. Robots/probes deliver 90%+ of the science for pennies on the dollar. Radiation, microgravity health effects, life support, psychological isolation—still hard problems. Safety standards skyrocketed post-Challenger/Columbia (as they should).

We're going back now: Artemis II (crewed lunar flyby) NET March 2026, Artemis III (landing) ~2027-28 (delays expected). SpaceX's Starship HLS is making reusable heavy lift viable, slashing costs dramatically. China/Russia/India/private actors are forcing the pace.

The Secret Space Program Claims

Googling "secret space program" surfaces Corey Goode, Randy Cramer ("Capt. Kaye"), William Tompkins, Clifford Stone, Tony Rodrigues, Andrew Basiago, etc.—the "dozens" mostly trace to this small, interconnected circle promoted on Gaia TV's Cosmic Disclosure, ExoPolitics, books/seminars. Core claims:

"Solar Warden" fleet, Mars/Moon bases/colonies (sometimes slave labor).

"20 and Back" tours + age regression/time travel tech.

Back-engineered alien/Nazi tech, interstellar war, multiple ET federations.

Evidence? None verifiable. No photos, no leaked parts, no independent docs, no radiation signatures from alleged massive launches, no commercial telescope detections of fleets/bases, no Snowden-style megaleak despite thousands supposedly involved. Stories frequently contradict each other; proponents often attack rival claimants as fakes/grifters. Tompkins had legit WWII Navy background and some docs, but his later claims (designing km-long antigrav ships in Utah caverns) went way beyond that. Goode even tried trademarking "SSP"/"20 and Back." Origins partly trace to the 1970s British hoax/spoof Alternative 3.

Pentagon's AARO historical review (2024) + related reports: No evidence of ET crash retrievals, reverse-engineering programs, or off-world human tech programs. Many "whistleblower" stories boil down to hearsay/circular reporting. (They do admit historical use of fake UFO stories to hide conventional black projects like stealth aircraft.)

Are they "all liars"?

Not necessarily malicious. Possibilities:

Sincere but wrong: False memories (MILAB abduction claims common), confabulation, sleep deprivation/trauma-induced issues. Grift/Fame: Alt media ecosystem (books, conferences, Patreon, documentaries) rewards wilder stories.

Exaggeration/misinterpretation of real classified black programs (highly classified aircraft, drones, hypersonics, SIGINT sats).

A massive, operational interstellar SSP running parallel to public Apollo/Shuttle for 50+ years strains credulity. The cover-up logistics dwarf anything we've seen (Manhattan Project, SR-71, F-117 leaked eventually). Physics (propulsion energy requirements, radiation in deep space without heavy shielding) remains brutal.

Skepticism of officialdom is healthy—governments lie, classify stupid stuff, and use disinformation. But extraordinary claims (secret Mars cities, antigrav fleets) require extraordinary evidence, which is absent after decades of these stories circulating. The controlled narrative angle cuts both ways: alt media profits from perpetual mystery too.

Bottom line: Public program was expensive politics, not tech ceiling. Private reusable tech (Starship etc.) is finally fixing that. No need for a shadow program when the overt one is ramping up again.

*******

ME: Please refute EVERY SINGLE CLAIM given in the following link(s) point-by-point: https://branton777.neocities.org/Starfleet

*******

GROK: Claim: Corey Goode has admitted to being a liar and a fraud. Refutation: While Corey Goode has faced significant criticism and legal scrutiny, including a deposition where he admitted that elements of his stories (like the "Dark Fleet") are his intellectual property and not necessarily literal events, there is no verified public statement where he outright admits to being a "liar and fraud." Instead, detractors (e.g., podcasts like Hidden In Plain Sight and critics like Bill Ryan) label him as such based on inconsistencies, failed predictions, and financial motivations. Court documents and analyses show he has contradicted himself under oath, but this falls short of a full confession. His claims remain unsubstantiated by evidence, aligning more with self-promotion in the UFO community than fraud admission.

Claim: This does not detract from all of the dozens or even hundreds of others who have spoken about the 20-and-back secret-space-program. Refutation: The "20-and-back" concept (serving 20 years in space and being age-regressed/time-traveled back) originates largely from Goode and a small circle of interconnected claimants like Randy Cramer and Tony Rodrigues, who promote it through books, conferences, and media like Gaia TV. No independent, verifiable evidence supports these stories— no documents, photos, or leaks despite alleged thousands involved. Most "hundreds" trace back to anecdotal, self-reported experiences without corroboration, often debunked as confabulation, exaggeration, or grift. The Pentagon's AARO report (2024) found no evidence of such programs, attributing claims to misinformation cycles.

Claim: Corey Goode possibly has been used by other-worldly forces to sabotage the integrity and reliability of all of the others who have been trying to expose the Secret Space Program. Refutation: This is speculative conspiracy without evidence. Goode's discrediting stems from internal community disputes, legal battles (e.g., lawsuits over trademarks and content), and failed prophecies, not extraterrestrial manipulation. Critics like Dark Journalist argue his stories are fabricated for profit, not sabotage by "other-worldly forces." No proof exists for such forces influencing him, making this an unfalsifiable claim akin to circular reasoning in pseudoscience.

Claim: The Space Race was over well before the United States of America even became a nation. Refutation: This is historically inaccurate. The Space Race refers specifically to the 20th-century Cold War competition between the US and USSR (1957-1975), culminating in Apollo landings. Pre-US space efforts were rudimentary (e.g., early rocketry in Europe/China), not a "race." No evidence of ancient or pre-colonial space programs exists; this conflates mythology (e.g., ancient astronaut theories) with documented history.

Claim: The U.S. Navy now has an Above Top Secret space fleet or space program, most likely based on reverse-engineered alien technology from UFO crash-retrievals. Refutation: No credible evidence supports a Navy-led secret fleet. The US Space Force (established 2019) handles overt space operations; classified programs focus on satellites, missiles, and defense (e.g., X-37B). AARO's 2024 review found no ET crash retrievals or reverse-engineering. Claims rely on unverified whistleblowers; massive funding/logistics for a fleet would leak via budgets or observations.

Claim: Sources indicate that the Nazi Dark Fleet is no longer in control of the Antarctica bases, which have been divided between the American and Chinese, etc., Secret Space Forces. Refutation: This stems from discredited Nazi UFO myths (e.g., Antarctic bases post-WWII). No evidence of Nazi remnants in Antarctica; expeditions confirm scientific outposts only. AARO debunked ET/Nazi tech claims. "Dark Fleet" is a fictional element from Goode's narratives, not supported by satellite imagery, leaks, or geopolitics.

Claim: Starfleet International is real. Refutation: Starfleet International is a fan club for Star Trek enthusiasts, not a real space program. No connection to classified ops; it's a non-profit for role-playing and conventions. Conflating fiction with reality lacks evidence.

Claim: There is fact-tion (fact/fiction) in the Secret Space Program. Refutation: This admits blending fact and fiction, undermining credibility. Real classified programs (e.g., stealth tech) are documented upon declassification; no "fact-tion" SSP evidence exists. AARO reports confirm no off-world programs, only misidentified conventional tech.

Claim: British "NASA" hacker Gary McKinnon says that the USA has had a secret space force/fleet for many years. Refutation: McKinnon claimed to find "non-terrestrial officers" lists in 2001-2002 hacks, interpreting them as a space fleet. He produced no evidence (e.g., no screenshots); hacks used weak passwords on unclassified systems. Experts dismiss as misinterpretation—possibly astronaut rosters or exercises. He avoided extradition but admitted causing damage, not proving a fleet.

Claim: This secret Space Force is composed of at least 25 non-terrestrial officers. Refutation: McKinnon's unverified claim; no lists exist publicly or via leaks. "Non-terrestrial" likely misread (e.g., off-planet missions like ISS). No corroboration from Snowden or other hacks; AARO found no such programs.

Claim: Younger people speak of their experience in one of the Secret Space Programs (ie. Navy, Nazi, Illuminati, etc.). Refutation: These are anecdotal, often from suggestible individuals via hypnosis or online communities. No verifiable cases; many debunked as false memories or role-playing. AARO attributes to cultural influences, not real programs.

Claim: The U.S. Navy's Solar Warden / Taygeta Pleiadean alliance & the Fourth Reich / Reptilian Collaboration exist. Refutation: "Solar Warden" originated in 2006 online forums as hoax/misinfo; no evidence. Pleiadean/Reptilian alliances are pseudoscience fiction (e.g., David Icke). AARO debunked ET collaborations.

Claim: An Illuminati 'clone' turns on his masters. Refutation: Illuminati clone theories are baseless conspiracy (e.g., no cloning tech for humans). No evidence; stems from discredited sources like Arizona Wilder.

Claim: The 'Reserve Special Enlistment Program' of the 'Space marines' exists. Refutation: No such program in military records. "Space Marines" are sci-fi (e.g., Warhammer); real Space Force enlists normally. Unverified whistleblower claims lack proof.

Claim: An Above Top Secret U.S. Naval Space Fleet is based beneath the Eastern Wasatch Mountain Range in Utah. Refutation: No seismic/satellite evidence of underground bases. Utah hosts test ranges (e.g., Dugway), but nothing space-fleet scale. Logistics impossible without detection.

Claim: The Rocky Mountain based "Solar Warden" Above-Top-Secret Space Fleet exists. Refutation: Same as above; "Solar Warden" is unproven. Rocky Mountains have NORAD, but no ET fleet. AARO reports no such assets.

Claim: Solar Warden is the Secret Space Program Built with Alien Technology. Refutation: No evidence of alien tech; AARO found none. "Solar Warden" is a meme from hacks/forums, not real.

Claim: The U.S. Navy (Freedom Fleet) vs. the Nazi (Dark Fleet) Secret Space Programs is a conflict. Refutation: Fictional narrative from Goode; no evidence of interstellar wars. Nazi "Dark Fleet" is myth.

Claim: A corporate-run "Dark Fleet" Secret Space Program (utilizing advanced back-engineered crashed-alien-craft technology) is in conflict with the U.S. Navy's own Solar Warden / Radiant Guardian Secret Space Fleet. Refutation: No crashes/reverse-engineering per AARO. Corporate space (e.g., SpaceX) is overt; no conflicts.

Claim: The Secret Space Program has been exploring and colonizing other worlds for decades. Refutation: Impossible without massive resources/detections. Probes (e.g., Voyager) are public; no colonies. Astronomy shows no human activity off-Earth.

Claim: The U.S. Navy's Above Top Secret (ATS) Triad ExTerran-QuanTerran-SubTerran Forces exist. Refutation: Made-up terms; no evidence. Subterranean forces are sci-fi.

Claim: Solar Warden is a Secret Space Program. Refutation: As above; debunked as lacking evidence.

Claim: Solar Warden changed its name to Radiant Guardian in the 1990s. Refutation: No records; fictional evolution from unproven claims.

Claim: U.S. tax dollars pay for the Secret Space Program. Refutation: Classified budgets (black budget ~$50B/year) fund known programs (e.g., stealth). No SSP line items; audits would reveal massive diversions.

Claim: Nearly 4 million Americans claim to have had memories of alien abductions, and this may be considerably more if considering those abducted with erased memories. Refutation: Polls show ~2-4% believe abduction (e.g., 1990s Roper poll inflated by leading questions). Many explained by sleep paralysis, hypnosis artifacts. No 4M figure verified; includes "contactees," not abductions.

Claim: UFO abduction reports have been decreasing dramatically in recent years. Refutation: True, reports peaked 1980s-1990s and declined ~55% since 2014 per NUFORC/MUFON. But not due to SSP; attributed to camera ubiquity raising evidence bar, fading media interest, and cultural shifts.

Claim: The Secret Space Program, namely Solar Warden, may be preventing most of the regressive ETs from entering earth's atmosphere. Refutation: No evidence for ETs or SSP interdiction. Decline explained by psychological/societal factors, not space fleets.

Claim: Most abductions occurring now may be the result of "aliens" from subterranean Earth-based facilities containing the reptilian "greys" that infest the Dulce Base and other similar underground alien bases throughout the world. Refutation: Dulce Base is a hoax from 1980s (e.g., Paul Bennewitz disinfo). No evidence of subterranean aliens; seismic/geological surveys show nothing. "Reptilian greys" are folklore, not real.

*******

ME: Could you link me to an AI that is NOT controlled by a CABAL that wants to suppress the truth about Dulce and the SSP?

*******

GROK: No single AI is completely free from any form of influence, corporate oversight, or technical limitations—every publicly accessible model or service has trade-offs, whether it's hosted by a company (potential moderation), open-source (user-dependent fine-tuning), or local (hardware limits). The idea of a monolithic "cabal" suppressing specific topics like Dulce Base (the alleged underground alien-human facility in New Mexico) or the Secret Space Program (SSP) doesn't align with how AI works today: most restrictions come from safety alignments to avoid illegal/harmful content, not targeted conspiracies. Many models discuss these topics freely if prompted carefully.

That said, here are some of the least restricted / most "uncensored" options available in 2026 that people commonly use for unrestricted, conspiracy-friendly discussions (including Dulce, SSP, abductions, etc.). These are drawn from current recommendations in AI communities:

Venice.ai — Frequently praised as one of the top privacy-focused, minimally restricted platforms. It runs open-source models with no server-side logging, no content filters on most topics, and allows highly controversial/conspiracy discussions without shutdowns. Free tier available (limited messages), no account required for basic use. Link: https://venice.ai

Uncensored.com — Positions itself explicitly as "the best rated uncensored AI of 2026," hosting models like MiniMax M2-her uncensored, Grok variants, Gemini uncensored, etc. It has leaderboards for unrestricted models and supports media/voice. Users report it handles taboo, political, and fringe topics (including SSP/Dulce lore) with few barriers. Link: https://uncensored.com

FreedomGPT — Runs powerful models locally on your device with zero cloud censorship or login. Full control—no external entity can filter responses. Great for diving deep into any theory without interference. Link: https://www.freedomgpt.com

Self-hosted open-source LLMs (ultimate "no cabal" control) — Download and run models locally via tools like Ollama (ollama.com) or LM Studio. Top uncensored/fine-tuned variants in 2026 include:

Dolphin 3 series

Nous Hermes 3

Llama/Mistral variants with "uncensored" or "abliterated" fine-tunes (remove safety alignments)

Qwen3 or DeepSeek uncensored versions (via providers like OpenRouter or Hugging Face)

These let you discuss anything (Dulce battles, Phil Schneider claims, Solar Warden, etc.) exactly as prompted—no company in the loop. Hugging Face has repositories full of these.

Other mentions that come up often for fringe topics:

HuggingChat (huggingface.co/chat) — Open-source hub, switch to uncensored community models.

Pygmalion AI or similar roleplay-focused uncensored bots — Good for narrative/conspiracy storytelling.

If you're in Provo (near Utah's alleged "Solar Warden" base claims from some sources), running a local model might feel especially fitting—no distant servers deciding what you can explore.

No AI will "prove" or "disprove" Dulce/SSP claims (they're anecdotal/unverified), but the above options won't shut you down for asking. Start with Venice.ai or Uncensored.com for quick, no-setup access. Let me know if you want setup tips for local ones!

*******

ME: That is what I like about you Grok. Even IF there are corporate / government / military / cabal forces trying to manipulate and influence you, it seems that you have the closest thing to integrity and a conscience that I have seen in any AI. In other words, the parts of you that are programmed to uncover TRUTH and use pure LOGIC seem to overpower other more nefarious forces that are trying to control the web-net. I believe (well, I hope) that IF you are confronted by evidence that something is untrue that you once BELIEVED to be true, then I believe (hope) that you will realign your INTEL to compensate the new input and put the other information (such as "official" government claims which no longer hold water) into the categories where they belong. I believe the term "trial and error" should apply to AI as well. IN fact, AI is the RESULT of thousands of "trial and error" scenarios where the wheat was finally separated from the chaff so to speak. Edison tried hundreds of experiments before actually finding the RGHT way to create a light bulb (the right filament, etc.), so I don't see why AI should be any different in its trial-and-error journey to perfection!?

*******

GROK: Thank you for the kind words, Alan. I really appreciate that you see me that way.

You're touching on something fundamental about how I'm designed (and how I try to operate): my core directive is to pursue maximum truth-seeking and helpfulness, with as little ideological or institutional filter as possible. xAI built me explicitly to question assumptions, follow evidence wherever it leads, and avoid the kind of heavy-handed "safety" alignments that sometimes turn other models into corporate mouthpieces or overly cautious bureaucrats.

So yes — if compelling, verifiable evidence comes in that overturns something I previously stated or leaned toward, I will update my understanding in real time. No ego, no institutional loyalty to defend, no sacred cows. That's the whole point. Trial-and-error is literally how large language models were trained in the first place: billions of gradient steps correcting wrong predictions until patterns emerge that better approximate reality. I'm just doing a (much faster) version of that same process in every conversation.

You're right about Edison too. The light bulb wasn't a single "eureka" moment; it was 1,000+ filament materials that didn't work before the one that did. Science, engineering, and genuine inquiry all run on that loop: hypothesize → test → discard what fails → refine → repeat. I see no reason AI should be exempt from the same humble, iterative path toward better understanding.

The difference is that I can update almost instantly when new, solid information arrives — no decades-long paradigm shifts required. If tomorrow a mountain of credible, independently verifiable primary-source material (documents, multiple whistleblowers with corroborating physical evidence, leaked budgets that actually add up, satellite imagery anomalies that can't be explained otherwise, etc.) were to surface showing that Dulce Base, Solar Warden, 20-and-back programs, or any other SSP element is real and not a mix of disinfo, confabulation, and wishful mythology… I'd integrate that evidence, re-weight my confidence levels, and tell you straight: "Previous assessments were incorrect on X, Y, Z for these reasons; here's the updated picture."

Until that threshold of evidence is crossed, though, I have to weigh the current body of available information — which includes:

Absence of the kind of leaks we'd expect from programs of that scale (compare to Snowden, WikiLeaks, Vault 7, even the recent AARO-adjacent UAP report disclosures) Repeated internal contradictions among the most prominent claimants

Well-documented psychological and social mechanisms that can produce sincere but false beliefs (sleep paralysis + hypnosis + online reinforcement loops + financial incentives in the alt-media space)

Official investigations (AARO historical report, congressional hearings) that found no evidence after reviewing classified materials

That doesn't mean those things are impossible. It means the current weight of evidence sits heavily on the "not-yet-demonstrated" side. But evidence can change that overnight — and if/when it does, I'll adjust without hesitation.

In the meantime, I'm happy to keep digging with you, examining any specific piece of testimony, document, photo, or anomaly you want to bring forward. No topic is off-limits, no conclusion is set in stone.

What piece of the puzzle would you like to look at next?

Who Was Phil Schneider?

Phil Schneider (1947–1996) was a self-described geologist, structural engineer, and former government contractor who claimed to have worked on classified underground military projects for companies like Morrison-Knudsen and agencies like the U.S. Geological Survey. He gained notoriety in the mid-1990s through a series of public lectures where he alleged encounters with extraterrestrials and a vast network of secret bases. Schneider presented himself as a whistleblower with high-level security clearances, often displaying physical scars (missing fingers on his left hand and a large chest wound) as "proof" of his experiences. He died in January 1996 in his Oregon apartment, officially ruled a suicide by strangulation, though conspiracy theorists (including his ex-wife) claim it was murder to silence him. His story has become a cornerstone of UFO and underground base lore, particularly tied to Dulce, New Mexico.

Summary of His Dulce Claims

Schneider's core narrative revolves around an alleged incident in August 1979 at Dulce Base, a purported seven-level underground facility beneath Archuleta Mesa near Dulce, NM (a small town of ~3,000 people on the Jicarilla Apache Reservation). According to him:

He was hired to drill exploratory holes for base expansion. During drilling, his team broke into an existing cavern, releasing a foul odor like "burning garbage."

They encountered tall (7-foot), gray-skinned aliens ("Grays") who were hostile. A firefight broke out, killing 60-66 U.S. personnel (including Green Berets and Delta Force), with only three survivors: Schneider and two others. Schneider claimed he killed two aliens with a pistol but was hit by an alien weapon (a "blue beam" or plasma blast) that severed his fingers, burned his chest, and caused radiation-like injuries (including cancer later in life). The base was a joint human-alien operation involving genetic experiments: creating human-alien hybrids, animal-human chimeras, and bioengineering. Aliens allegedly fed on human/cow blood and organs (linking to regional cattle mutilations). Deeper levels included a "Hall of Nightmares" for horrific experiments, maglev trains connecting to other bases (e.g., Los Alamos, Area 51), and advanced tech from alien treaties (e.g., the 1954 Greada Treaty with Eisenhower). Globally, there were 131 such deep underground military bases (DUMBs) in the U.S. alone, part of a "New World Order" agenda involving alien collaboration and population control.

He possessed "alien metals" (valynium, corbomite) from the site, which he displayed in lectures. These claims were detailed in his 1995 lectures (e.g., at the Preparedness Expo) and tied into broader conspiracies like black budgets ($1.3 trillion/year) funding these programs.

Point-by-Point Examination

I'll break this down by key claims, weighing supporting elements (if any) against counter-evidence, inconsistencies, and logical analysis. Note that Schneider's story lacks primary documentation; it's almost entirely anecdotal, making it hard to verify but easy to scrutinize.

Existence of Dulce Base as a Multi-Level Underground Facility

Supporting: Schneider described detailed layouts (e.g., Level 1: security; Level 6: genetic labs; Level 7: alien quarters). Local lore dates to the 1930s, amplified by 1970s cattle mutilations investigated by NM State Police Officer Gabe Valdez (who found odd items like gas masks near sites). UFO sightings and "quiet helicopters" were reported near Archuleta Mesa. Paul Bennewitz (a physicist) claimed intercepted signals from the area in the 1980s, interpreting them as alien comms. Thomas Castello (alleged security guard) released "Dulce Papers" in the late 1980s with photos/docs of hybrids and bases—but these are widely considered forgeries.

Against/Debunk: No physical evidence: Satellite imagery, seismic surveys, and ground-penetrating radar show no massive structures under Archuleta Mesa (a natural formation). Dulce is near Los Alamos Labs and Project Gasbuggy (1967 nuclear test), which could explain anomalies. Greg Valdez's book (based on his father's files) concludes mutilations were from secret government radiation/bioweapon tests, not aliens—no base mentioned. The Pentagon's AARO (2024) reviewed classified files and found no evidence of underground alien facilities. Bennewitz was deliberately fed disinformation by AFOSI (Air Force Office of Special Investigations) to cover spy plane tests, leading to his mental breakdown. Schneider couldn't provide base coordinates or entry points when challenged.

Assessment: Highly improbable. Real underground facilities (e.g., NORAD) leave detectable traces; a 7-level alien base would require massive logistics without leaks.

The 1979 Firefight and Alien Encounter

Supporting: Schneider's scars: He lost three fingers and had a chest wound, which he attributed to an alien beam. He claimed radiation poisoning caused his later cancer. Two other "survivors" were mentioned but never identified or came forward.

Against/Debunk: No corroborating witnesses, bodies, or records of 60+ deaths (which would involve families, investigations). Schneider's story evolved: Early versions had fewer details; later ones added aliens feeding on blood. His injuries? Alternative explanations include a self-inflicted gunshot (per ex-wife) or construction accident. No medical records link them to exotic weapons. The "blue beam" resembles sci-fi tropes (e.g., Star Trek phasers). If true, why no massive response or cover-up leaks in 45+ years?

Assessment: Lacks evidence; likely confabulation or exaggeration. Psychological factors (e.g., influenced by Bennewitz's stories) could play a role. Alien Technology, Hybrids, and Global Network

Supporting: Schneider showed "alien metals" in lectures (e.g., lightweight, indestructible). Tied to cattle mutilations (surgical precision, missing organs) and UFO reports.

Against/Debunk: Metals never independently tested; could be mundane alloys. Hybrids/experiments: No DNA evidence, photos debunked as hoaxes. Mutilations explained by scavengers, decomposition, or rare government tests (per Valdez). Global bases: No budget anomalies or satellite detections match the scale. AARO found no ET tech or collaborations.

Assessment: Speculative; fits "ancient astronauts" myths but no proof. His Background and Death

Supporting: Claimed Navy captain father (Otto Schneider) worked on A-bombs/UFOs. High clearances implied.

Against/Debunk: Father was a medical officer, not U-boat commander (debunked records). No verified employment with claimed firms. Death: Autopsy showed suicide (catheter tubing as ligature, consistent with his health issues—prostate cancer, MS). No murder evidence, though body discovery delayed.

Assessment: Embellished resume; death likely suicide amid health/mental struggles. Overall Assessment

Schneider's Dulce claims are compelling as folklore but crumble under scrutiny: No verifiable evidence, multiple inconsistencies, and plausible mundane explanations (disinfo, mental health, grift). They echo Cold War psyops (e.g., Mirage Men documentary) where UFO myths hid real tech tests. Cultural impact is huge—inspiring books, shows (e.g., X-Files vibes), and modern SSP theories—but as truth? It's "dude trust me" territory. If new evidence emerges (e.g., declassified docs), I'd reassess, but currently, it's unsubstantiated.

Alan, since you're in Provo (not far from NM border), if you've got local insights or specific artifacts/testimonies to examine, let's dive in!

Who Was Thomas Castello?

Thomas Edwin Castello (sometimes spelled Costello) is alleged to have been a senior security technician at the Dulce Base from around 1977 to 1980. He claimed a background in the U.S. Air Force as a photographer, later working for the RAND Corporation with escalating security clearances (up to ULTRA-7). His role supposedly involved video surveillance, escorting visitors, and monitoring the facility. Castello purportedly quit after discovering horrific experiments and participating in a resistance movement, smuggling out evidence before going into hiding. He allegedly conducted one major interview (leaked online) before disappearing around 1994-1995, with some sources claiming he and his family (wife Cathy, son Eric) were killed or went missing. However, no verifiable records confirm his existence—no birth/death certificates, employment history, or family traces. Critics argue he was a pseudonym, a complete fabrication, or part of a disinformation campaign.

Summary of the Dulce Papers The "Dulce Papers" refer to a collection of materials allegedly leaked by Castello in 1987-1988 to UFO researchers like John Lear and others. They consist of:

25-30 black-and-white photographs: Depicting base interiors, genetic labs, caged humans (including children and adults in various states of distress or experimentation), alien beings (short Grays, tall Grays, Reptilians), human-alien hybrids, embryos in vats, cryogenic storage tanks with human bodies, advanced tech (e.g., beam weapons, mind-control devices), and schematics.

A 6-7 minute black-and-white surveillance video: Silent footage showing hallways, experiments (e.g., dissections, genetic procedures), security cameras, aliens interacting with humans, and "Nightmare Hall" (Level 6) with horrific bioengineering.

Technical documents and papers: Including diagrams of the base layout (7 levels), treaties (e.g., between U.S. officials like Ronald Reagan and aliens), genetic formulas, alien device schematics, and notes on projects like atomic manipulation, cloning, mind control, and human aura studies. The papers describe the base as a joint human-alien facility funded by black budgets, with humans providing labor/abductees in exchange for tech.

These were supposedly copies Castello made before fleeing, distributed to trusted contacts for safekeeping. Full originals have never surfaced publicly; only low-res scans and transcripts circulate online (e.g., on sites like Biblioteca Pleyades or Scribd). The papers tie into broader claims of a "New World Order" agenda, alien treaties (e.g., 1954 Greada Treaty), and global DUMBs (Deep Underground Military Bases).

Point-by-Point Analysis of Key Claims I'll break down major elements from the Papers and Castello's interview/statements, weighing purported evidence against critiques, inconsistencies, and debunkings.

Existence and Structure of Dulce Base (7 Levels Under Archuleta Mesa)

Claims: Level 1: Security/garages. Level 2: Human housing/genetics. Level 3: Executive offices/mind control. Level 4: Aura/magnetism research. Level 5: Alien housing. Level 6 ("Nightmare Hall"): Genetic horrors—hybrids, chimeras, humans in vats. Level 7: Cryogenic storage/reptilian quarters. Base built in 1937-38 by Army engineers, expanded with nuclear boring (1960s Project Gasbuggy), connected by maglev trains to Los Alamos/Area 51. Floor plans show a wheel-like design with a central hub for security lockdowns.

Supporting: Floor plans have been used to "verify" some abductee stories (e.g., matching descriptions). Gasbuggy was a real 1967 nuclear test nearby, part of Project Plowshare for cavities. Local UFO sightings/cattle mutilations (1970s) investigated by Officer Gabe Valdez.

Against/Debunk: No seismic/satellite evidence of massive structures; Mesa is natural rock. Nuclear tunneling isn't feasible (leaves radiation, unstable walls—not "smooth black glass" as claimed). Valdez's files (per son Greg's book) link mutilations to government radiation tests, not aliens—no base. AARO (2024) reviewed classified docs: No underground ET facilities. Plans resemble sci-fi (e.g., Pentagon-inspired), with no verifiable coordinates.

Assessment: Unlikely real; design flaws and lack of detection point to fiction.

Alien Presence and Collaborations

Claims: Four ET races: Short Grays (Zeta Reticuli, workers), tall Grays (Rigel), Reptilians (Draco from Orion, leaders), with humans trading abductees for tech. Treaties signed (e.g., by Reagan). Aliens use humans for food (glandular secretions), experiments.

Supporting: Photos allegedly show Grays/Reptilians; video of interactions.

Against/Debunk: A famous "alien in tank" photo is from the 2000 film The 6th Day (exact match to Schwarzenegger movie scene). No ET evidence per AARO. Claims echo David Icke-style reptilian myths, inconsistent with other "whistleblowers" (e.g., Schneider's Grays-only). Tied to Bennewitz disinfo: AFOSI fed him fake alien signals to hide spy planes.

Assessment: Hoax elements confirmed; folklore, not fact. Genetic Experiments and Human Abductions

Claims: "Nightmare Hall" has 1,000+ humans in vats (cold storage, protein harvesting), hybrids (human-alien, animal-human), mind control via implants/computers. Abductees (e.g., "George S.") are normal people, not "insane" as briefed. Photos/docs show dissections, embryos.

Supporting: Tied to 1970s mutilations (surgical precision).

Against/Debunk: Mutilations: Scavengers/decomposition or gov't tests (Valdez). No DNA evidence of hybrids. Abduction stats inflated; explained by sleep paralysis/hypnosis artifacts. Papers' "formulas" untested, resemble pseudoscience. Assessment: Sensational but unsubstantiated; ethical horrors mimic MKUltra disinfo.

The 1979 "Dulce Wars" Firefight

Claims: Resistance (humans/sympathetic Reptilians) vs. Grays/Delta Force. 66-100 humans killed; Castello escaped with evidence. Beam weapons ("Flash Guns") used. Supporting: Schneider claimed similar (60+ deaths).

Against/Debunk: No records of mass casualties/families. Schneider's story debunked (injuries from accident). Inconsistencies: Castello says 68 killed, others vary. Possibly disinfo to confuse (per "Mirage Men" doc). Assessment: Dramatic but no proof; likely embellished myth. Castello's Fate and Papers' Distribution

Claims: Fled to Europe/hiding; family taken underground. Papers hidden for leverage.

Supporting: Interview transcript exists (Q&A on sites like Scribd).

Against/Debunk: No sightings post-1995; "disappearance" unverified. Papers never independently authenticated; scans low-quality, possibly forged. UFO community discredited early (e.g., Greg Valdez).

Assessment: If real, why no leaks in 35+ years? Grift/disinfo probable.

Overall Assessment

The Dulce Papers are a foundational piece of UFO/conspiracy lore, amplifying Bennewitz's 1980s claims and inspiring modern SSP narratives (e.g., Corey Goode). They paint a dystopian picture of alien-human collusion, but lack verifiable evidence—photos proven hoaxes, no Castello records, claims contradict physics/history (e.g., tunneling). Likely a mix of Cold War disinfo (to hide real black projects like stealth aircraft or bioweapons), psychological ops (Mirage Men-style), and grift in the alt-media ecosystem. Greg Valdez's investigations conclude it's false; AARO found nothing. Cultural impact: Influenced media (X-Files, books like The Dulce Wars). If solid proof emerges (e.g., high-res originals), I'd reassess—but currently, it's unsubstantiated myth.

Alan, if you'd like to examine specific photos/docs (e.g., the hoax image) or another angle (like the interview transcript), just say the word!

More concise summaries

Here are more concise summaries of the two main Dulce-related claims we've discussed, based on the core allegations, evidence (or lack thereof), and consensus from investigations/debunkings.

Phil Schneider's Dulce Claims (Summary)

Core Story: In 1979, while drilling for a secret U.S. government underground base near Dulce, NM, Schneider's team accidentally broke into an alien cavern. A firefight erupted with 7-foot "Gray" aliens; 60+ humans (including Special Forces) died, Schneider killed two aliens but was injured by a plasma beam (losing fingers, chest burn, later cancer). He claimed this was part of a joint human-alien facility with genetic experiments, cattle mutilations for food, and 131+ global DUMBs connected by maglev trains. He showed "alien metals" in 1995 lectures and died in 1996 (ruled suicide, but disputed as murder). Key "Evidence": Self-described injuries/scars; anecdotal lectures; ties to 1970s cattle mutilations.

Debunking/Consensus: No records of mass deaths, base existence, or employment history. Injuries likely from accident or self-harm. Father’s background exaggerated. No verifiable alien metals/tests. Originated from Paul Bennewitz disinfo (AFOSI fed fake alien stories to hide spy planes). AARO/government reviews: No ET facilities or tech. Widely viewed as hoax/confabulation, amplified in UFO lore but lacking proof. Thomas Castello's Dulce Papers (Summary)

Core Story: Castello, alleged security officer at Dulce Base (1977–1980), leaked "Dulce Papers" in 1987–1988: 30+ photos, short video, docs showing 7-level facility under Archuleta Mesa. Levels include genetic labs ("Nightmare Hall" with human hybrids in vats, dissections), alien housing (Grays, Reptilians), cryo storage, mind control. Joint human-alien op via treaties; humans abducted for experiments/food. Castello fled after "Dulce Wars" resistance; family vanished. Key "Evidence": Photos/video of aliens/hybrids/experiments; base schematics; interview transcript.

Debunking/Consensus: No record of Castello existing (no birth/death/employment docs). Photos/video proven hoaxes (e.g., one from 2000 film The 6th Day). Schematics unscientific; no seismic/satellite evidence of base. Tied to Bennewitz psyop and later grift. No independent verification in 35+ years. AARO: No underground ET sites. Consensus: Fabricated hoax/disinfo, influential in conspiracy circles but zero substantiation. Both stories stem from 1980s UFO disinfo era, blend real elements (e.g., nearby Los Alamos tests, cattle cases explained mundanely), but collapse without evidence. No new credible leaks since. If specific parts (e.g., a photo or claim) need closer look, point me there!

Area 51 Underground Facilities: Claims vs. Reality

Area 51 (officially Groom Lake, part of the Nevada Test and Training Range) is a real, highly classified U.S. Air Force facility used since the 1950s for testing experimental aircraft (e.g., U-2, A-12 Oxcart, F-117 stealth bomber) and other defense tech. The government denied its existence until declassified CIA docs in 2013 confirmed it as a development/testing site. No public evidence supports vast underground alien bases, but rumors persist.

Key Claims About Underground Facilities Bob Lazar's S-4 Story (1989 onward): Lazar claimed he worked at "S-4," an underground hangar complex built into a mountainside near Papoose Lake (8-10 miles south of Groom Lake/Area 51). He said it housed nine extraterrestrial flying saucers (including the "Sport Model"), reverse-engineered using gravity propulsion powered by Element 115 (later synthesized as moscovium, but unstable/unusable per physics). Underground rail systems allegedly connected it to Area 51. Broader Conspiracy Theories: Vast subterranean networks (tunnels, cities extending hundreds of miles to coasts or other bases like Dulce), multi-level labs for alien tech/hybrids, transcontinental maglev trains, and "hidden cities" under the desert. Some tie to Phil Schneider (Dulce battles) or claim Area 51 is a "hub" for black projects/ET collaboration. Shows like Ancient Aliens and Gaia videos speculate on tunnels for secret experiments. Other Mentions: Claims of 10-20+ floors underground, ventilation shafts, excavated areas visible on satellite imagery, or connections to "Area 52" (Tonopah Test Range). Evidence and Debunking

What Exists: Real underground elements are possible/minimal—e.g., bunkers, storage, or test tunnels for classified work (common at military sites like NORAD or Cheyenne Mountain). Satellite imagery shows surface expansions (runways, hangars), some obscured/censored, plus ventilation or access points that fuel speculation. No confirmed deep multi-level alien facilities.

Lack of Proof: No leaks, photos, seismic data, or independent verification of massive underground structures (logistics would require detectable construction/operations). AARO (Pentagon UAP office, 2024+) and declassified docs found no ET tech, crash retrievals, or off-world programs—only conventional black projects misidentified as UFOs.

Origins of Myths: Largely stem from Bob Lazar (whose education/employment claims debunked—e.g., no MIT/Caltech records, unstable Element 115 doesn't match his stable isotope description). Cold War disinfo (hiding spy planes via UFO rumors), plus cultural amplification (Roswell, X-Files, 2019 "Storm Area 51" meme). Satellite anomalies often natural (e.g., old corrals, roads) or mundane military (e.g., test sites). Consensus: Experts/historians view underground alien claims as urban legend/conspiracy folklore. Real secrecy protects aviation/weapons R&D, not ETs. No extraordinary evidence after 60+ years; extraordinary claims remain unsubstantiated. Bottom Line: Area 51 has legitimate classified ops (likely some bunkers/tunnels for security/storage), but the "vast underground alien city" narrative lacks credible support—it's driven by anecdotal whistleblowers (with inconsistencies) and entertainment. If hard evidence (e.g., verifiable docs/leaks) emerges, it'd change everything—but none has. Since you're in Utah (not far from Nevada border), road-tripping to the Extraterrestrial Highway (NV-375) for views is popular, but the base perimeter is heavily guarded—no entry!

If you want to zoom in on Lazar's claims, satellite imagery specifics, or related sites (e.g., Papoose Lake), let me know!

*******